Clear and how to get rid of ants in your house naturally Present Danger The Mahablog

Trump is obstructing justice in plain site. He assumes congress can’t do anything to stop him. He may be right. Congress can issue subpoenas until it turns purple; if the attorney general is not inclined to enforce them, they won’t be enforced. And we know william barr is trump’s personal attorney, so there will be no help from the department of how to get rid of ants in your house naturally justice.

Most of the claims trump has made seem frivolous on how to get rid of ants in your house naturally their face. If courts are operating even broadly within existing precedent or how to get rid of ants in your house naturally the logic of the constitution trump will lose. The issue is delays working through the courts. Possibly greater standing in an impeachment context won’t make the system operate faster. It’s also quite possible that judges — and even more supreme court justices — won’t operate within precedent or the logic of the constitution. But that’s just another reason why operating on the basis of how to get rid of ants in your house naturally people’s wishful thinking about how judges should act is a how to get rid of ants in your house naturally fool’s errand.

And this illustrates the degree to which the entire structure how to get rid of ants in your house naturally of the U.S. Government has depended on the willingness even of the most how to get rid of ants in your house naturally powerful officials to act within precedent. If the president and attorney general together simply refuse to how to get rid of ants in your house naturally comply with law, what mechanism is there to force them to comply? I don’t believe the nation has confronted this question before.

If you spend much time at sourcewatch, you begin to see how the whole infrastructure, from media outlets, heritage foundation and other “think tanks,” and the mostly astroturf advocacy organizations are all being funded how to get rid of ants in your house naturally by a relatively small group. Oh, and don’t forget ALEC. Time and time again, you run into the same few names. The koch boys are prominent, of course, but other names that come up frequently include the lynde how to get rid of ants in your house naturally and harry bradley foundation, the scaife foundations and the claude R. Lambe charitable foundation.

In short, dozens of allegedly independent right-wing organizations are all being bankrolled by a relatively small how to get rid of ants in your house naturally group of foundations. And as charles pierce keeps pointing out, it’s these people who are driving the right’s agenda, not the republican party.

It has been an article of faith in this shebeen how to get rid of ants in your house naturally almost since we opened it in 2011 that there is how to get rid of ants in your house naturally no actual republican party in any real sense any more. Ever since the supreme court legalized influence-peddling in its citizens united and mccutcheon decisions, there only has been a loosely held group of independent how to get rid of ants in your house naturally franchises who are doing business for themselves under the republican how to get rid of ants in your house naturally party brand. This is why the suits belonging to obvious anagram reince how to get rid of ants in your house naturally preibus are so very empty.

You can bet they love the trump administration’s deregulatory agenda, but more than anything else, they love the tax cuts republicans passed last year. While koch industries is a private company — so we don’t know very much about its particulars — one analysisestimated that charles and david koch, whose combined wealth is $120 billion, will gain between $1 billion and $1.4 billion every year from the tax cut. The koch network says it spent $20 million promoting the bill, which turned out to be a pretty spectacular investment.

The turning point for the republican party was the reagan how to get rid of ants in your house naturally administration. Since then it has changed into a PR firm and how to get rid of ants in your house naturally operations center for oligarchic kleptocrats. They started with simple sales techniques like putting reagan in how to get rid of ants in your house naturally front of national monuments to make speeches on the teevee. They progressed through gingrich’s negative sell words, then fox news and all the freaks in its shadow, including policy "intellectuals" in think tanks. Now, in part thanks to the operation being fittingly taken over how to get rid of ants in your house naturally by an amoral game show host, R’s have arrived in an alternative political universe with its how to get rid of ants in your house naturally own alternative facts (thank you, kellyanne). There’s nothing haphazard about it. A lot of social science has been applied. Democrats have been, to put it kindly, slow to react.

For all that, there’s finally some change in the air. There were the midterms. There’s the new mayor of chicago, lori lightfoot. There’s the democratic presidential candidates field, in which an old white guy probably won’t be victorious, no matter the conventional wisdom of the moment. In most polls voters claim they will vote against trump how to get rid of ants in your house naturally by almost 2 to 1. Things are weird, but not at all hopeless.

In his conduct of the office of president of the how to get rid of ants in your house naturally united states, richard M. Nixon, contrary to his oath faithfully to execute the office of how to get rid of ants in your house naturally president of the united states and, to the best of his ability, preserve, protect, and defend the constitution of the united states, and in violation of his constitutional duty to take care how to get rid of ants in your house naturally that the laws be faithfully executed, has failed without lawful cause or excuse to produce papers how to get rid of ants in your house naturally and things as directed by duly authorized subpoenas issued by how to get rid of ants in your house naturally the committee on the judiciary of the house of representatives how to get rid of ants in your house naturally on april 11, 1974, may 15, 1974, may 30, 1974, and june 24, 1974, and willfully disobeyed such subpoenas. The subpoenaed papers and things were deemed necessary by the how to get rid of ants in your house naturally committee in order to resolve by direct evidence fundamental, factual questions relating to presidential direction, knowledge or approval of actions demonstrated by other evidence to how to get rid of ants in your house naturally be substantial grounds for impeachment of the president. In refusing to produce these papers and things richard M. Nixon, substituting his judgment as to what materials were necessary for how to get rid of ants in your house naturally the inquiry, interposed the powers of the presidency against the the lawful how to get rid of ants in your house naturally subpoenas of the house of representatives…

We all remember that the GOP requested information on the how to get rid of ants in your house naturally IRS giving GOP-leaning applications for nonprofit status a hard time – and then excoriated the IRS for discriminating against GOP-leaning groups, based on a report that didn’t even *try* to find if the discrimination was general (it was).

We all remember terri schiavo – and how the GOP didn’t look at the public record, and made their followers think that 20 separate judges would how to get rid of ants in your house naturally ignore a woman’s civil rights to let her die, and why? So they could ask "why do liberals want terri to die?"

We all remember that the GOP, as a whole, used "lock up an innocent public servant" as a rallying cry for 2016, when they all knew there were no criminal charges that how to get rid of ants in your house naturally could be brought by any ethical prosecutor. (there’s no evidence she deliberately shared classified information; and "gross negligence" – well, look it up. It’s a term of art. It’s the equivalent of "I left my keys in my unlocked car, and walked away for an hour.")

But the president using his authority to try to shut how to get rid of ants in your house naturally down an investigation, getting revenge on public servants, and *still* trying to prosecute an innocent woman, that’s all okay. So, presumably, although he was trying to score a $300 million payday from russia, his team met with russians hoping for dirt, his son-in-law wanted a secret back-channel to russia without any US oversight, and sure, trump is all happy-puppy over putin, presumably, in spite of all that, the investigation was so baseless that it’s okay that he *tried* to shut it down, because he didn’t succeed.

I read an essay once – it claimed that, when hitler’s final solution was brought forward, there were a lot of people in the room who how to get rid of ants in your house naturally were truly shocked and horrified. The thing is, they were *all* dirty. And if just one speaks up, that person dies. If a couple people speak up, they’ve been infiltrated by spies. By the time the final solution was proposed, they’d gone too far down the road, and all of them were too badly tainted, to feel they could resist.

We’re not there – I’m not saying the GOP is like the nazis. Still, look at how much they’re doing to protect their boy, and how much of it is unthinkable from a moral how to get rid of ants in your house naturally and ethical perspective. They’re marching down that slope, and they’re normalizing what they’re doing now, so they’ll feel free to stretch the boundaries a bit more.

RELATED_POSTS