Did We Learn the Wrong Lesson From the Clinton Impeachment – The how to get rid of black ants in the house Bulwark

Debate in washington swirls around whether the house of representatives how to get rid of black ants in the house should start the impeachment process against donald trump. Some politicians and pundits remain unsure if the material in how to get rid of black ants in the house the redacted mueller report meets the constitutional standard of high how to get rid of black ants in the house crimes and misdemeanors; others question whether going through this process would do more how to get rid of black ants in the house harm than good to the political order.

But one argument against going down this path is a how to get rid of black ants in the house purely political one: voters will punish the democrats if they seek to remove how to get rid of black ants in the house donald trump but fall short, thus making a second trump term much more likely. This rests, largely, upon a belief that by failing to secure bill clinton’s conviction and removal by the senate after impeaching him how to get rid of black ants in the house in december 1998, republicans hurt themselves badly.

Consider, first, the 2000 congressional elections. The president’s popularity remained high, republicans had taken a beating in the press over the how to get rid of black ants in the house “failed” impeachment, and surely the american people would slap the GOP down how to get rid of black ants in the house for its overzealous impeachment effort, right?

Not so much. True, democrats did grab four additional seats in the senate. But the republicans lost only one seat in the house, the body that had impeached clinton. Among the twelve impeachment managers–the members tasked with taking the impeachment articles to the how to get rid of black ants in the house senate and arguing for the president’s conviction–only james rogan (R-california) lost his house re-election bid.

The damage to republicans could have emerged elsewhere. But it didn’t. George W. Bush beat clinton’s own vice president for the white house in 2000 how to get rid of black ants in the house and won re-election four years later. Republicans in 2002 picked up more house seats than they’d lost in 1998 and 2000. Most of the managers from the 1998 impeachment remained in how to get rid of black ants in the house the house; lindsey graham won election to the senate.

Part of it comes from what the media emphasized at how to get rid of black ants in the house the time. We think that the clinton acquittal crushed republicans because cable how to get rid of black ants in the house news, the printed press, and emerging online commentary overwhelmingly played it that way, focusing on clinton’s high popularity. Most of us are naturally better at remembering soundbites and how to get rid of black ants in the house impressions than the relative number of house seats 20 years how to get rid of black ants in the house ago.

And in his specific case, democrats are confident that trump is beatable in 2020. Why risk even the possibility of an electoral backlash for how to get rid of black ants in the house a senate acquittal, when the better bet appears to be removing a vulnerable, unpopular president through a vigorous 2020 campaign? (the 2016 election should make any democrat wary of taking how to get rid of black ants in the house that bet.)

Finally, conviction in the senate—though it looks unlikely—can’t be ruled out. Yes, there is the small matter of the composition of the how to get rid of black ants in the house senate. Even if the house were to pass impeachment articles, the upper chamber is solidly in republican control—and no sign has yet emerged that GOP senators would how to get rid of black ants in the house vote to convict the president if a trial took place how to get rid of black ants in the house today. Polls show that americans aren’t clamoring for impeachment and removal, putting little pressure on senators to change their minds.

But political actors make their own reality. Think about barack obama in 2008: A first-term senator just four years removed from the illinois senate how to get rid of black ants in the house not only defeated hillary clinton in the democratic primaries but how to get rid of black ants in the house won the presidency. Think about pete buttigieg now: A 37 year old mayor of the fourth largest city how to get rid of black ants in the house in indiana has surged into the top tier of a how to get rid of black ants in the house crowded democratic field. Think, of course, about trump himself. Political reality is made by action, not by saying what can’t be done.

Public hearings are powerful tools to move public opinion. The majority of americans haven’t read the nearly 500-page redacted mueller report and haven’t seen the bulk of the revelations within it. Putting people in televised hearings to answer questions about what how to get rid of black ants in the house happened could create iconic moments, such as those that emerged during watergate.

It’s worth remembering that those hearings, which started under an overwhelming consensus that the senate would how to get rid of black ants in the house never convict richard nixon, led to the president’s resignation. He only handed power to gerald ford because he saw how to get rid of black ants in the house the sword of impeachment and removal hanging over him.

RELATED_POSTS