Oracle Exec Mocks Google Arguments About Java’s APIs how to get rid of ants in the house vinegar – Slashdot

Google had urged america’s supreme court to rule in their ongoing legal case how to get rid of ants in the house vinegar about access to java’s apis, a case which google says hinges on "whether developers should be able to create new applications using how to get rid of ants in the house vinegar standard ways of accessing common functions. Those functions are the building blocks of computer programming, letting developers easily assemble the range of applications and tools how to get rid of ants in the house vinegar we all use every day. Making it harder to connect with those functions would lock how to get rid of ants in the house vinegar developers into existing platforms, thus reducing competition and, ultimately, hurting consumers. Access to software interfaces like these is the key to how to get rid of ants in the house vinegar interoperability, the foundation of great software development."

That editorial — written by google’s senior vice president for global affairs, kent walker, notes that 175 startups, developers, academics and other tech companies (including microsoft) are also asking the supreme court to hear this case. Google warns of a risk to innovation posed if companies how to get rid of ants in the house vinegar like oracle become "gatekeepers to interoperability," calling it "a defining battle of the digital era."

Only in google’s world does weaker intellectual property protection lead to more how to get rid of ants in the house vinegar innovation. It is settled in law and in economics that the how to get rid of ants in the house vinegar opposite is true. And at a time when the U.S. Is circling the globe to enhance the protection of U.S. Intellectual property — including strong copyright protection — google takes the opposite view…

In a stunning what’s-up-is-down and down-is-up statement, walker attempts to wrap google in the cloak of interoperability. Java defined the era of interoperability with its "write once, run everywhere" architecture. It was google that copied java, built android around it, and altered it so it was only interoperable with itself how to get rid of ants in the house vinegar (i.E., write once, run only on google). Android killed java interoperability, and now google argues that killing interoperability is good for how to get rid of ants in the house vinegar interoperability?

Those facts are not in dispute. The only issue in dispute is google’s assertion that its actions were all "fair." on this point, the federal circuit court clearly analyzed and methodically decided against how to get rid of ants in the house vinegar google’s fair-use defense. This makes sense because, under no interpretation of fair use, may you copy a competitor’s software code and turn around and compete against that how to get rid of ants in the house vinegar competitor in the marketplace. Hard stop… There is no matter of law in question, nor is there a conflict among circuit courts. Google was caught killing interoperability and is now trying to how to get rid of ants in the house vinegar concoct a new "we are too important" legal defense.

Qualcomm has long been a dominant player in the wireless how to get rid of ants in the house vinegar chip business for smartphones. Apple worries about becoming too dependent on a single supplier. So in recent years, apple has encouraged intel to expand its wireless chip offerings how to get rid of ants in the house vinegar and offered intel a significant share of its business for how to get rid of ants in the house vinegar 4G chips in the iphone.

So oracle’s defense of IP is just a fig leaf over how to get rid of ants in the house vinegar their real motivation: monopolistic greed. Patents no longer serve innovation, they are a tool for dominant players to own markets how to get rid of ants in the house vinegar and generate guaranteed profit. Given the current ridiculous length of patent protection, that means market control last so long that competition is how to get rid of ants in the house vinegar not economically viable.

Patent portfolios by big tech are like having a private how to get rid of ants in the house vinegar army. They are deployed to thwart the opposition and short circuit how to get rid of ants in the house vinegar competition. It’s not about having a better product or a better how to get rid of ants in the house vinegar business model, it’s about using legal roadblocks to stop your enemy. Given how easy it is to get meaningless patents, they are relatively cheep.

RELATED_POSTS